904-W222 904-W222

904-W222 4



Baudelairewould have approved Alfred Stieglitz’s painting on the grounds thatit is a representation of what was in the artist’s mind. Itrepresents Stieglitz’s thoughts, fantasy and dreams. As far asBaudelaire is concerned, any piece of art is influenced by humanimagination (Baudelaire, n.d.). It is not influenced by nature.Baudelaire would have also approved the painting for the reason thatit helps the artist and his or her audience to remember past events.It is the best way though which all things that happened in the pastcan be commemorated by the people who are living today. It is alsoimportant to note that Baudelaire would have approved the painting onthe grounds that just like photography, painting serves as a handmaidof the artist (Stieglitz, 1922). The artist uses it to pass acrosshis or her message to the members of the society in order for them tomake use of it.

Onthe other hand, Baudelaire would have not approved Stieglitz’spainting for various reasons. To begin with, he was convinced thatart can never be an exact reproduction of nature (Baudelaire, n.d.).Therefore, Stieglitz’s painting may not be an exact reproduction ofthe American artist Georgia O`Keeffe that it presents. It is just amere portrait of the artist. Baudelaire would have also not approvedthe painting on the grounds that the audience should not look at thebeauty of an art only (Baudelaire, n.d.). This issue should be leftfor the artists, engineers and philosophers. Therefore, the audienceshould stop being judgmental to the works of art. It is alsoimportant to not that Baudelaire would have rejected the art based onthe fact that it does not represent charming and tragic scenespertaining to ancient history. Stieglitz’s painting does not meetthis requirement. Therefore, it may be difficult for Baudelaire toconsider it as an art.

Thereare various characteristics that qualify Stieglitz’s painting as aform of art. To start with, the painting is just a replica of thevisual world around the artist (Stieglitz, 1922). It is a portrait ofGeorgia O`Keeffe. The painting is industrial in nature. It does notrepresent the actual things in nature. It is just a mererepresentation of the reality of nature. Stieglitz’s painting ismeets the principles of artistic realism (Stieglitz, 1922). It is atrue reflection of the artist’s mental world. Just like in otherworks of art, the beauty in the painting is determined by its artist.The audience has no control on the taste of beauty carried by thepainting. It is also important to not that Stieglitz’s paintingattracts public reaction. It is the nature of any good piece of artto catch the attention of the audience.

Onthe other hand, there are also some characteristic that do notqualify Stieglitz’s painting as an art. To begin with, any good artshould not provoke astonishment (Baudelaire, n.d.). The facialfeatures of the portrait in the painting in question seem to attractastonishment. Unlike in other arts, Stieglitz’s painting is notbased on ridiculous titles based on laughable subjects. The title ofthe painting is Portraitof Georgia O’Keeffe.It is also important to note that the painting does not express theexternal reality (Stieglitz, 1922). It instead gives a portrait of awell known individual. As a result, it may be difficult to understandwhat it portrays.


Baudelaire,C. (n.d.). TheModern Public and Photography.Provided.

Stieglitz,A. (1922). Portraitof Georgia O’Keeffe. Provided.