Project Team



In“Examples of s”, Duggan argues that organizingemployees into teams enhance the success of a project throughimproving work coordination. The employees can accomplish objectivesfaster because everyone is aware of his or her duty. I support theauthor’s assertion because many project managers fail because theyare unable to coordinate the concerned persons. In my view,coordinated teams can solve problems. In addition, teamwork enhancesindividual motivation since each employee will be forced to maintainthe pace of his or her colleagues (Duggan, 2014).

Organizedemployees are also necessary to establish a functional department.The common organization approach is top-to-down hierarchy. When thesenior management intends to communicate some form of changes, theinformation is easily conveyed through various management officelevels. The lowest manager is employees’ supervisors who aredirectly in charge of the workers. In case a problem arises,well-coordinated staff is at a suitable position to solve the problemeasily. In case of a crisis, the management can coordinate the staffquickly. Besides, staff training is affordable since the employer caninvite consultants to train various teams on site.


Employeesare highly motivated when the expectations of the employer areclearly defined. In addition, employees are more productive when theyare aware of the requirements of their employers. Miscommunicationcan decrease the morale of a team through making them feelunappreciated. For example, if a manager complains that the qualityof work a given team delivered was low quality, the group members canfeel discouraged. However, the manager could have intended to meanthat the members of a given team will require fixing some issues. Inaddition, employees are highly motivated when they know theirspecific obligations in an organization. Some researchers argue thatcustom communication can reduce innovation of employees since as itmight restrict application of new ideas. However, many companiesencourage their employees to participate in making essential decisionconcerning the business. This means that formal communicationprovides a suitable environment for brainstorming ideas that canenhance development of a business.


Inmy view, project implementation involving a team working remotely canbe effective since the latest communications technology facilitatesreal-time communication, which is adequate to link a team workingremotely. However, project implementation is impossible when theentire team is working virtually. A central office is essential forfostering close relationship among employees. In some cases, workcoordination is difficult for virtual employees compared to staffworking in a physical office. According to psychologists, physicalcontact encourages humans to develop emotional bonds. Emotional linkis essential for enhancing trust and collaboration among employees.Furthermore, virtual teams increase conflicts among the team membersbecause they may lack common cultural ethics. For example, anAmerican can write a straightforward email to a colleague complainingabout a dissatisfactory situation. However, such an email would beoffensive if a colleague sends to an Asian colleague such asJapanese. A physical office can help to foster good relationshipamong employees from different backgrounds. As a result, implanting aproject when the entire team is working virtually is verychallenging, and often impossible.


Afterthe implementation of a project, the team should remain intact untilthe plan is complete. The staff will require meeting occasionally tosolve problems that arise when in the course of implementing aproject. For example, if the staff is behind a project’s schedule,the team should meet to deliberate on the strategies they can use toaccelerate the program.


Duggan,T. (2014). Examples of s. AZCentral.Web. Retrieved on March 1, 2015 from